In the early days of CS conferences, it was thought that calling the conference papers "papers" might conflict with later journal publication, while calling them "extended abstracts" preserved the idea that they were merely summaries of longer journal papers to come. This was especially true in more mathematical areas, since math has far fewer conferences that publish papers. By now, the idea that conference papers can later be expanded to journal papers is well established and you can call them whatever you want.
The program committee thought it might be useful to put together some advice for authors. How the Papers Were Reviewed: At the request of the program committee chair, program committee members and their graduate students refrained from submitting any abstracts to the conference.
This allowed us to avoid having to deal with direct conflict of interests. Each program committee member was assigned 60 abstracts, based on his or her areas of expertise.
Since all abstracts were sent to all committee members, members could review any abstracts they wished, so long as they reviewed at least the abstracts assigned to them.
Program committee members could review the abstracts themselves or have others review them, although in most cases the program committee members at least briefly reviewed all the abstracts they were assigned, even if they had colleagues review some of them in detail for them.
Since I read more abstracts than I was assigned, this came down to an average of one hour per abstract. In reading an abstract, I had to try to understand the work presented, the significance of it, and possible problems with it.
I spent at least minutes on almost every abstract, sometimes coming back to an abstract several times. I spent over four hours each on several abstracts. In one case this was because the abstract looked interesting but was badly written; in another case, because the abstract dealt with a dense subject.
In several cases, I spent several hours on a paper simply because I had expertise or interest in the topic described by the paper. The program committee met for two days to discuss the submitted abstracts and choose those to be accepted. A preliminary numerical ranking provided by the reviews received in advance of the meeting helped structure our discussions.
On each of several passes through all the submissions, some papers were eliminated from consideration, others were retained for further discussion and some were accepted. Finally, we had a total of 28 accepted papers.
What is an Extended Abstract? An extended abstract is not simply a long abstract. An extended abstract should contain references, comparisons to related work, proofs of key theorems and other details expected in a research paper but not in an abstract.
An extended abstract is a research paper whose ideas and significance can be understood in less than an hour.
Extended Abstract Style Guide for A&WMA’s Specialty Conferences Writing a good extended abstract can be more demanding than writing a research paper. The extended abstract should clearly specify the problem(s) that the research is Your extended abstract will be reproduced in the conference proceedings as a CD-ROM, or as online. Guidelines for Preparation of ASMS Extended Abstracts “Extended abstracts” must be submitted in PDF format. Refer to Guidance for Generation of PDF Files for. The extended abstract should contain references, comparisons to related works and other details expected in a scientific paper but not in an abstract. "An extended abstract is a research paper whose ideas and significance can be understood in less than an hour of reading.
Writing an extended abstract can be more demanding than writing a research paper. Some things that can be omitted from an extended abstract: Some Issues Considered by the Committee: Are there any major technical flaws in the abstract?
In a few rare cases, reviewers found serious technical flaws in a submission. Is the work a significant advance over previous work in the area, by the same authors or others? The abstract should give a clear description of the advantages offered by the new technique over previous techniques.
Examples and measurements are great for this. A related problem is not citing relevant work in the area.
If you have additional current papers on topics related to your submission accepted by or submitted to other conferences or journalsbe sure to discuss the contribution of your submission over that of your other papers. If the work involves a specialized application, does it make a more general contribution?
Some abstracts described interesting specialized applications. Much of the content of these abstracts involved descriptions of the context of the work or applying standard techniques in the new context. Does the abstract offer an interesting perspective on a problem or describe experience that might be useful to others?How to write a good abstract for a conference paper Getting your paper accepted for any academic conference will involve writing an abstract.
Here, Albrecht Sonntag explains how to make sure yours stands out to the conference organisers. Credit: Flickr, Terry Johnston.
An abstract is a brief summary of the paper you want to present at an. Writing an extended abstract can be more demanding than writing a research paper. Some things that can be omitted from an extended abstract: future work, details of proofs or implementation that should seem plausible to reviewers, ramifications not relevant to the key ideas of the abstract.
Extended Abstract Style Guide for A&WMA’s Specialty Conferences Writing a good extended abstract can be more demanding than writing a research paper. The extended abstract should clearly specify the problem(s) that the research is Your extended abstract will be reproduced in the conference proceedings as a CD-ROM, or as online.
An extended abstract and a full paper are nearly the same; the primary difference is that an extended abstract tends to be somewhat shorter than a full paper; I've seen extended abstracts from 2 pages up to 6 pages, while conference papers run from 4 up to about 12 or 15, depending on the space allotted.
The extended abstract should contain references, comparisons to related works and other details expected in a scientific paper but not in an abstract. "An extended abstract is a research paper whose ideas and significance can be understood in less than an hour of reading.
How-To(sday): How to Write a Paper or Conference Proposal Abstract — 77 Comments LaurenMPD on March 16, at pm said: Having read several posts/articles on how to write a conference abstact, I found yours to be particularly helpful.