What accounts for these differences? How much of the difference is inherent in the way each of the two companies competes?
This is because American naval officers are unfamiliar with amphibious invasions and procure ships unsuited for this mission. Marine Corps officers only plan for small amphibious seizures, which are much different.
Some ramble nonsense about tiny MEUs with just combat Marines conducting "forcible entry" amphibious operations. Army officers seem unaware that the US Army conducted massive amphibious operations during World War II and ramble nonsense about airborne operations.
The US Navy has 33 huge, expensive, vulnerable, and inefficient "amphibious" ships that cannot safely operate within a hundred miles of an enemy coast. Most of their design is wasted with well decks filled with landing craft and hangar decks filled with helicopters and tiltrotors to act as "connectors" to shuttle men and material ashore.
These expensive, vulnerable, and unarmed connectors add no combat power and cannot safely operate within ten miles of an enemy coast because they are easily destroyed by precision guided guns and missiles. The US military has completely ignored the appearance of revolutionary video-guided missiles while lesser powers like South Korea field a deadly multi-role video-guided fiber optic missile.
These problems exist because the US Navy's amphibious fleet is no longer amphibious, but devolved into huge, comfortable cruise ships designed to operate in safe seas for extended Third World police missions. Yet because of the proliferation of long-range self-guided anti-ship missiles, the safe standoff distance to unload is now said to be up to miles offshore!
First, Marines ashore will lack naval gunfire support as the Navy's 5-inch mm guns lack the range to fire more than 13 miles. In addition, unarmed minesweepers are vulnerable if they try to clear lanes near shore without destroyer escort and no one has explained why large helicopters and unarmored aluminum skinned LCACs pictured will not be destroyed trying to shuttle material ashore from ships safely at sea.
But what is the point of securing a shallow spot along a coast that transport ships with an invasion force cannot approach? Another ignored problem is moving fuel, which accounts for more than half the cargo needed ashore, but is not easily transported by connectors.
Several studies have proven over-the-horizon invasions impractical, including one from the Naval War College: Advocates of OMFTS need classes on the basic math of logistics where one compares how much cargo connectors can move ashore each day to what is required by combat forces. In addition, there are no practical plans to resupply "seabased" ships offshore as their stores are quickly depleted.
Joint Pub 2. FM logistics operations 3.
The National Academies of Sciences Study: InLSTs pictured stormed ashore at Normandy to unloadsoldiers and their equipment before German armored divisions could mount a counterattack. OMFTS is for small dangerous raids and lacks the firepower for serious fighting.
An amphibious invasion requires landing a powerful ground force before an enemy can counterattack. Attempting to shuttle cargo from ships miles offshore takes ten times longer even with fast LCACs and tiltrotors.
In addition, well-deck operations are difficult in mildly rough seas and LCACs can't hover well in white-cap waves. However, ships that move into a protected bay have less problems with difficult seas and offloading ten times faster allows them to depart the dangerous combat area much sooner.
Moreover, there are never enough ships to embark the entire invasion force along with needed supplies. Amphibious and cargo ships must offload quickly and return to regional staging areas to embark more troops, equipment, and supplies.
Operation Lam Son began in early and was the last major employment of helicopters by the US military. The United States provided logistical, aerial, and artillery support to the operation. American ground forces were prohibited by Congress from entering Laotian territory, but supported the offensive by rebuilding the airfield at Khe Sanh.
South Vietnam provided its best units for this month long offensive and the Pentagon was confident that American firepower and air mobility would guarantee victory. After a series of bloody battles, the South Vietnamese retreated back home after losing nearly men.
US Army support elements lost men killed, wounded, 38 missing, and lost helicopters while 7 American fighter-bombers were shot down. During the Gulf War and invasion of Iraq, proposals for major airborne and helicopter assault operations into hostile territory were considered, but Generals wisely dismissed them.
Inthe Marines launched a limited aerial assault called " Task Force X-Ray " to land an infantry battalion using 51 helicopters into a blocking position in Kuwait. Despite total air superiority, nearby modern airfields, and weeks of planning, it was aborted after the helicopters were airborne.
It became evident the operation was too complex and too dangerous even against a demoralized enemy. InArmy Generals okayed dropping paratroopers in northern Iraq where American Special Operations soldiers and their Kurdish troops had already secured the drop zone. It took 15 hours to assemble the scattered paratroopers in this unnecessary sideshow.
Helicopters and tiltrotors provide no combat value in serious amphibious invasions. They are great for moving personnel and supplies among ships and staging bases. They are great for sea rescues.
Once the coastal area is secured, they are great for moving personnel to the beach and evacuating wounded from safe areas.How serious is the threat of DJC’s entry into the U.S.
market to the American Connector Co. (ACC)? Competitors are a treat to American Connector Company but ACC is its own biggest threat. ACC is very inefficient in its operations – Sunnyvale has an effective utilization of % whereas Kawasaki has an effective utilization percentage of %.
40 Years of Service ; About CDA. 40 Years of Service ; Celebrating 40 Years of Service Peace brought a serious dilemma to the metals industry: What to do with all that copper?
Electricity generation, of course, was a crucial market. But, American homes were dominated by iceboxes rather than refrigerators, air conditioning had yet to. Physical Security of the U.S. Power Grid: High-Voltage Transformer Substations Paul W.
Parfomak American Electric Reliability Corporation (NERC) to submit to the Commission new reliability potential threats and vulnerabilities, and implement security plans to protect against attacks. An electric car (also battery electric car or all-electric car) is a plug-in electric automobile that is propelled by one or more electric motors, using energy typically stored in rechargeable batteries.
Basic Information about Lead in Drinking Water. This can result in serious effects to the mother and her developing fetus, including: Reduced growth of the fetus; between $20 and $ Contact your water supplier as they may have useful information, including whether the service connector used in your home or area is made of lead.
Q1 How serious is the threat of DJC to American Connector Company? Ans: DJC viewed highly competitive manufacturing as absolutely critical to its competitive.