You are a speaker in a debate on the topic.
Military justice blogs are to blogs as military music is to music. The witness [the civilian defense counsel] clearly refused, through counsel, because I saw the e-mail. There are significant optics if not legal differences between a warrant of attachment to appear in Virginia and one to appear in Guantanamo.
Air Force Colonel Vance Spath — the chief judge of the Air Force and a judge on the military commissions and the person who held General Baker in contempt — apparently wants federal authorities to use force to bring two DoD civilian attorneys to Guantanamo.
Carol Rosenberg of the Miami Herald reports here that: Marshals to seize two civilian defense attorneys who have quit the case and ignored his orders and a subpoena to appear at the war court.
A warrant of attachment see R. The Manual for Courts-Martial provides the following discussion: Subpoenas issued under R.
Failing to comply with such a subpoena is a felony offense, and may result in a fine or imprisonment, or both, at the discretion of the district court. The different purposes of the warrant of attachment and criminal complaint under Article 47 should be borne in mind.
The criminal complaint, prosecuted through the civilian federal courts, has as its purpose punishment for failing to comply with process issued by military authority.
It serves to vindicate the military interest in obtaining compliance with its lawful process. Carol Rosenberg also reports that: The judge had earlier Tuesday expressed a reluctance to have the women seized.
He said in court that their arrests could cause them to lose their security clearances and jobs with the Department of Defense and thwart his goal of having them return to the defense team of Abd al Rahim al Nashiri.
This is — by the way — a unique rule for the Guantanamo commissions; there is no similar limitation on civilian defense counsel in courts-martial.Civilian rule is always better then the military rule and I have my reasons which am about to state below to backup my claim that civilian rule is better than military rule.
Civil rule is better than military rule for several important reasons. History of the Design and Production. Many radio engineers of the thirties firmly believed that the absolute best sensitivity and stability of a communication receiver's RF amplifier, First Detector and Local Oscillator could only be achieved by using "plug-in" coils.
Civilian rule is always better then the military rule and I have my reasons which am about to state below to backup my claim that civilian rule is better than military rule. Civil rule is better than military rule for several important reasons.
First of all civil rule tends to allow for and respect the idea of civil rights. 1. USAA · USAA provides service members, veterans and families with a comprehensive suite of mentoring tools and information to assist with the transition process and civilian employment.
More information about Burma is available on the Burma Page and from other Department of State publications and other sources listed at the end of this fact sheet.. U.S.-BURMA RELATIONS. The United States supports a peaceful, prosperous, and democratic .
the answer is simple its not even better than civilian rule why do you think that the civilian governors are the ones ruling us now because nobody wanted military governors.